跳到主要內容

2025.05.19國昌質詢|徐少東涉22億非法吸金判12年多次未到案 涉反滲透法 為何無羈押也無監控?逃案紀錄官員未能掌握? 司法漏洞重重 再次重傷人民對司法信任 法務部司法院和檢方只能互推責任?

2025.05.19國昌質詢|徐少東涉22億非法吸金判12年多次未到案 涉反滲透法 為何無羈押也無監控?逃案紀錄官員未能掌握? 司法漏洞重重 再次重傷人民對司法信任 法務部司法院和檢方只能互推責任?
 
#國昌質詢
賴清德總統執政將滿周年,根據媒體所公布民調,司法改革不滿意度最高、滿意度最低,結果面對人民的怒火,法務部長鄭銘謙竟然還有臉認為司改成績是及格的,真的是恬不知恥。

近日,又一個重大金融罪犯跑了!三聯集團負責人徐少東吸金洗錢遭重判12年,上週未依規定向派出所報到,傳出已偷渡逃亡,但法院遲至今日尚未發布通緝。

更離譜的是,徐少東早有多次通緝未到案的紀錄,還違反《反滲透法》被起訴,法院曾於裁定理由指出,有私下管道能出境,但徐少東不僅人未被羈押在外面趴趴走,更沒被實施電子監控,這到底誰要負責?院檢還要繼續互踢皮球?

此外,我接獲檢舉,有調查官以祕錄設備偷拍未成年女性裙底,如此令人髮指的行為,兩個禮拜過去了,調查局遲至今日尚未停職,我要求調查局儘速開考績會依法懲處。

角頭吳明達於1999年犯下殺人罪後遭判無期徒刑確定,2017年法務部假釋出獄付保護管束,結果吳明達出獄後繼續犯罪,買凶殺人、洗錢、詐欺、恐嚇取財樣樣都來,當初的假釋到底是怎麼做的?真的有符合悛悔實據的要件?

也難怪人民對無期徒刑毫無信心,即便犯下殺人罪遭判無期徒刑,也只關了十多年就假釋,無期徒刑根本形同虛設!鄭銘謙部長說,有研擬重大犯罪不得假釋法案,目前行政院審查中,到底行政院還要「研議」多久?卓榮泰院長還要無視人民的憤怒到何時?

2012年,民間司改會曾開記者會展開「追緝惡檢」行動,對檢察官問案威脅、恐嚇、逼人認罪、押人取供的不當做為,提出沉痛的控訴,十多年過去了,當初主導行動的林峯正、顧立雄跟尤伯祥,也早成為民進黨政府的高官,但這些問題不存在了嗎?我要求法務部長回去瞭解第一線實務,到底檢察官是如何問案的。

備詢官員:法務部長 鄭銘謙 / 司法院秘書長 王梅英 / 調查局副局長 吳以公

資料與影片來源:【國昌質詢】賴清德總統執政週年 司改成績慘不忍睹|2025-05-19|司法及法制委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnCODr6AZvA #黃國昌  #HuangKuoChang #taiwan  #legislator #太離譜了

Translation:
As President Lai's administration nears its one-year mark, public dissatisfaction with judicial reform has reached alarming levels. Multiple media-conducted polls indicate that judicial reform not only ranks lowest in public satisfaction but also tops the list in terms of public disapproval. Yet, in the face of mounting outrage, Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙) audaciously claims that judicial reform has earned a "passing grade." Such a claim is not only out of touch—it is a disgrace.

Just recently, another high-profile financial criminal has escaped justice. Hsu Shao-tung(徐少東), head of the Sanlian Group(三聯集團), was convicted of illegal fundraising and money laundering, receiving a 12-year prison sentence. Last week, he failed to report to the police station as required, and it is now believed he has illegally fled the country. Shockingly, as of today, the court has yet to issue a wanted notice.

Even more troubling is Hsu Shao-tung's long record of evading law enforcement, including prior indictments under the Anti-Infiltration Act(反滲透法). The court had already acknowledged his access to private means to leave the country, yet he was neither detained nor subjected to electronic monitoring. How could such a blatant risk be so grossly ignored? Who will be held accountable for this glaring failure? Are our courts and prosecutors content with merely passing the buck?

The situation is no better within our investigative agencies. I have received credible reports that an investigator used covert devices to secretly record inappropriate footage of underage girls—an appalling act that reportedly occurred two weeks ago. Yet the Investigation Bureau has not suspended the official in question. I call on the Bureau to immediately convene a disciplinary committee and initiate legal proceedings. Inaction in such cases is not only negligent—it is complicity.

The pattern of systemic failure continues. Wu Ming-ta(吳明達), an organized crime figure convicted of murder in 1999 and sentenced to life imprisonment, was granted parole with protective supervision in 2017 by the Ministry of Justice. Since his release, Wu has been implicated in a series of serious crimes, including hiring assassins, money laundering, fraud, and extortion. On what basis was his parole approved? Was there truly "clear evidence of remorse," as required by law?

It is no surprise that public faith in life sentences has collapsed. When even convicted murderers can walk free after a dozen years, what message does that send about justice and accountability? Minister Cheng Ming-chien has stated that a bill to prohibit parole for major crimes is currently under review by the Executive Yuan. But how long does the Executive Yuan intend to "deliberate"? And for how much longer will Premier Cho Jung-tai(卓榮泰) ignore the growing public outrage?

Let us not forget: in 2012, the Judicial Reform Foundation launched its "Tracking Rogue Prosecutors" campaign, exposing systemic abuses—coercion, intimidation, forced confessions, and illegal detentions. More than a decade has passed. The key figures behind that movement—Lin Feng-jeng(林峯正), Wellington Koo(顧立雄), and Yu Po-hsiang(尤柏祥)—have since ascended to prominent positions within the current Democratic Progressive Party administration. But have these deep-rooted problems truly been resolved?

I call on Minister Cheng Ming-chien to personally investigate how prosecutors are conducting interrogations today. This administration cannot claim progress while turning a blind eye to institutional failure, judicial negligence, and abuse of power.

Officials to answer interpellation:Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙), Deputy Secretary-General of the Judicial Yuan,Wang Mei-ying(王梅英), Deputy Director General of the Investigation Bureau Wu Yi-kung(吳以公)
----------------
#黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #台灣民眾黨 #立法院質詢 #國會監督 #揭弊 #徐少東潛逃 #金融犯罪漏洞 #未到案紀錄 #人民不信任司法 #TaiwanJusticeFail #TaiwanNews #JudicialReform

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

2026年的新年感謝

年末將至,2025年即將成為過去,我在「天佑好人」頻道,此刻想藉著這段文字,向每位默默支持、熱情關注頻道的朋友們,獻上最深切、最溫暖的感謝。

你的低潮不是懶惰!神經科學證實:啟動DMN找回「未來感」的3個零成本修復法

你的低潮不是懶惰,而是「未來感」暫時失焦了:神經科學證實的內在動力修復法 親愛的你,如果你正處於一種提不起勁的狀態,請先溫柔地告訴自己:這不是你的錯。 很多時候,那股沉甸甸的低潮,並非源於懶惰、逃避,也不是意志力薄弱。它更像是一種「未來感」的暫時失焦——你太久沒有清晰地「對未來有感覺」了。

2025.06.23國昌質詢|曾彈劾他人濫用公務車的監委 如今自己違法卻不下台?拖延的紀律委員會可能無法處理李俊俋 惹疑官官相護?官員想幫監委開脫? 監察法規定別想轉彎 禁伐補償預算未兌現考驗政府誠信

2025.06.23國昌質詢|曾彈劾他人濫用公務車的監委 如今自己違法卻不下台?拖延的紀律委員會可能無法處理李俊俋 惹疑官官相護?官員想幫監委開脫? 監察法規定別想轉彎 禁伐補償預算未兌現考驗政府誠信 #國昌質詢 去年6月,立法院修法通過原住民禁伐補償每公頃調升至6萬元,行政院卻未於總預算中編列相關預算,直到11月朝野黨團協商時,卓榮泰院長才承諾會提追加預算,請問何時要提出?