【國昌質詢】綠色權貴鍾文智棄保潛逃 司法院、法務部互踢皮球｜2025-03-26｜司法及法制委員會

2025.03.26國昌質詢｜綠色權貴鍾文智棄保潛逃 司法院、法務部互踢皮球｜#鍾文智 再度棄保潛逃 司法黑幕、民進黨相護勾結包庇曝光 司法內部疑涉黑手操控？高檢署說有請高院「繼續施以電子監控」是誰在說謊？高院施壓法官迴避？司法院調查報告隱匿真相？

#國昌質詢 前年，金融重犯朱國榮棄保潛逃引發社會譁然，司法院與法務部皆說要精進防逃，但日前坑殺投資不法獲利4.9億、遭判30年5月的鍾文智再次棄保潛逃，真的是令人憤怒！

這位神通廣大的鍾文智，一通電話就幫暴力黑幫寶和會槍手辦特見，交保時還有民進黨議員幫忙辦理，甚至有多名民進黨的立委為其個案提修法脫罪，與綠營關係緊密。

結果去年10月，高院法官竟然認為，鍾文智繳納2000萬保證金後，就不用電子監控，或許知道太丟人現眼，這個裁定甚至沒有上網公開，今天王梅英副秘書長也承認依法應該要公開，為什麼剛好碰到鍾文智就沒有公開？到底在遮掩什麼？

更離譜的是，高院說有問過檢察官，沒有意見才解除電子監控，但高檢署卻說有建請高院「繼續施以電子設備監控」，是誰在說謊？今天司法院、法務部仍是各執一詞，沒有人要負責？

事實上，鐘文智已經不是第一次棄保潛逃，第一審審理時，鐘文智不僅棄保潛逃遭通緝，甚至還於通緝期間冒名使用他人護照非法出境2次，結果高院法官還認為不用電子監控，這到底是怎麼回事？

去年，我質詢司法院，在鐘文智案的審理期間，竟然有高院庭長施壓法官，要求上簽自請迴避，司法院卻毫無作為、一再包庇，今天王梅英副秘書長再次幫忙開脫為「雙方解讀不同」，真是讓人不敢置信！

原本被施壓的法官裁定鍾文智應接受電子監控，但心灰意冷離職後，另一位法官便裁定不用電子監控，而這位法官剛好曾與鍾文智辯護人為最高法院同一刑事庭的法官，難道是遇到不順眼的法官就想辦法換掉，換一個配合的？司法院要徹查到底，給社會一個交代！

備詢官員：司法院副秘書長王梅英、法務部徐錫祥政務次長

資料與影片來源： 【國昌質詢】綠色權貴鍾文智棄保潛逃 司法院、法務部互踢皮球｜2025-03-26｜司法及法制委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MESkE31pYxU @KC-Huang #黃國昌 #taiwan  #legislator #太離譜了

Translation:

Two years ago, financial criminal Chu Kuo-Jung(朱國榮)'s escape while on bail sparked public outrage. In response, both the Judicial Yuan(司法院) and the Ministry of Justice(法務部) pledged to strengthen measures to prevent such incidents. Yet, despite these assurances, history has repeated itself—Chung Wen-Chih(鍾文智), who illegally profited 490 million from fraudulent investments and was sentenced to 30 years and 5 months, has now also escaped while on bail. This is truly infuriating!

Chung Wen-Chih, highly resourceful, was able to arrange special prison visits for gang members of the violent Baohe society(寶和會) with just a phone call. His bail release was facilitated by a Democratic Progressive Party(DPP) councilor, and multiple DPP legislators even proposed amendments to laws that could have exonerated him—demonstrating his close ties with the party.

In a shocking decision last October, the High Court ruled that after posting a 20 million bail,Chung Wen-Chih would not require electronic monitoring. Perhaps aware of the controversy, the ruling was not even published online. Today, Deputy Secretary-General of the Judicial Yuan Wang Mei-ying(王梅英) admitted that, according to the law, it should have been disclosed. Why was it withheld in Chung Wen-Chih's case? What is being concealed?

Even more outrageous is the conflicting statements from judicial authorities. The High Court claims it consulted the prosecutor, who allegedly had no objections to lifting the electronic monitoring. Yet, the Taiwan High Prosecutors Office(臺灣高等檢察署) refutes this, stating that it had, in fact, recommended continued electronic monitoring. Who is lying? The Judicial Yuan and the Ministry of Justice continue to contradict each other, while no one takes responsibility.

This is not Chung Wen-Chih's first escape. During his first trial, he not only absconded while on bail but also managed to illegally leave the country twice using someone else's passport. Despite this history, the High Court still deemed electronic monitoring unnecessary. How is this possible?

Last year, I questioned the Judicial Yuan about this case. During the trial, a High Court presiding judge allegedly pressured another judge into voluntarily recusing themselves. The Judicial Yuan did nothing to address this and repeatedly attempted to cover it up. Today, Deputy Secretary-General of the Judicial Yuan Wang Mei-ying once again dismissed the matter, calling it a "difference in interpretation" which is simply unbelievable!

Originally, the pressured judge had ruled that Chung Wen-Chih should be electronically monitored. However, after resigning in frustration, another judge took over and removed the requirement. This replacement judge happened to have previously served in the same criminal division of the Supreme Court as Chung Wen-Chih's defense lawyer. Could it be that unfavorable judges are being replaced with more cooperative ones?

The Judicial Yuan must conduct a thorough investigation and provide the public with a clear and honest explanation!

Officials to answer interpellation： Deputy Secretary-General of the Judicial Yuan,Wang Mei-ying(王梅英), Ministry of Justice Deputy Minister Xu Xi-Xiang(徐錫祥)

------------------

#司法淪陷 #防逃破功 #高院離譜裁定 #司法院 #法務部 #黑道勾結 #電子監控失靈 #棄保潛逃再犯 #司法改革刻不容緩 #TaiwanPolitics #JudicialScandal #CorruptionExposed #JudicialReform #LegalAccountability #NoMoreEscapes #TransparencyNow #JusticeDenied #JusticeForAll