【國昌質詢】違法縱放鍾文智 檢察官接受招待有雙標？｜2025-04-10｜司法及法制委員會

2025.04.10國昌質詢｜違法縱放鍾文智 檢察官接受招待有雙標？綠營權貴特權的司法黑手 略式裁定成司法漏洞？誰在護航？ #司法院縱放 #司法崩壞 #政治干預司法 #新潮流特權 #官官相護 #雙標 

#國昌質詢 綠色權貴鍾文智棄保潛逃，去年10月，高院命鍾文智繳2000萬就解除科技設備監控，根本違法未做出裁定，導致鍾文智遭縱放，直到我質詢後，才匆匆補上「略式裁定」，讓人不敢置信。

今天司法院的書面報告也坦承「略式裁定」毫無依據，若鍾文智方主張繳2000萬不合法該如何處理？案件審理單可以代替裁定嗎？「略式裁定」的原本跟正本有相符嗎？今天司法院副秘書長王梅英完全無法回應，並推給合議庭，司法院必須給社會一個交代。

去年，北檢有五名檢察官與民進黨新潮流大老、欠國家1億7千多萬吳乃仁去高檔餐廳接受招待，嚴重敗壞司法公信力，遭移送個案評鑑，但這個標準有適用所有的檢調嗎？

現任北檢檢察長王俊力，時任調查局長時，前去受調查對象楊兆麟於台塑集團招待所飲宴，楊嗣後也因行賄鄭文燦遭起訴，在我公開質疑後，竟也沒有接受任何的調查與懲處，檢察官官箴有雙標嗎？

今天法務部長鄭銘謙說要秉公處理，希望別遇到自己人就是高高舉起、輕輕放下。

備詢官員：司法院副秘書長王梅英、法務部部長鄭銘謙

資料與影片來源：【國昌質詢】違法縱放鍾文智 檢察官接受招待有雙標？｜2025-04-10｜司法及法制委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfH7Ka4U2lY  @KC-Huang #黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #taiwan  #legislator #太離譜了

Translation:

The green elite Chung Wen-chih(鍾文智) absconds After dubious bail decision. Chung Wen-chih,a prominent figure aligned with the DPP, fled after being released on bail - raising serious concerns about judicial integrity. In October last year, the High Court permitted Chung Wen-chih to post bail in the amount of NT$20 million, which resulted in the removal of the monitoring electronic device. However, this decision was made in the absence of a formal ruling, rendering it fundamentally unlawful. It was only after I publicly questioned the legitimacy of this move that a so-called "summary ruling" was hastily appended to justify the release—an act that strains credulity.

Shockingly, the Judicial Yuan's written report today conceded that this "summary ruling" lacked any legal foundation. If Chung Wen-chihg's legal team now argues that the NT$20 million bail payment was made under unlawful circumstances, how should the judiciary respond? Can a trial unit retroactively substitute a ruling? Do the original and the official versions of this "summary ruling" actually align? These are critical questions, and yet the Deputy Secretary-General of the Judicial Yuan Wang Mei-ying(王梅英) was unable to offer any substantive answers - merely deflecting responsibility onto the collegiate bench. The Judicial Yuan owes the public a full and transparent explanation.

Last year, five prosecutors from the Taipei District Prosecutors Office were wined and dined at a luxury restaurant by Wu Nai-jen(吳乃仁), a senior figure in the DPP's New Tide faction(新潮流), who is personally indebted to the state for more than NT$170 million. This blatant conflict of interest has rightfully been referred for case-specific review—but one must ask: does this standard apply uniformly to all prosecutors and investigators?

For example, the current Chief Prosecutor of the Taipei District Prosecutors Office, Wang Jyun-li(王俊力), previously served as Director-General of the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau. During his tenure, he attended a banquet at the Formosa Plastics Group(台塑集團) guesthouse hosted by Yang Chao-lin(楊兆麟), who was later indicted for bribing Cheng Wen-tsan(鄭文燦). After I publicly raised this issue, no investigation or disciplinary action was initiated. Is this yet another case of selective accountability?

Today, Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙) pledged that the matter would be addressed with impartiality. However, the public is weary of empty assurances. We must not allow this to become yet another case where justice is proclaimed loudly, only to fall silent when it concerns those within the establishment.

Officials to answer interpellation：Deputy Secretary-General of the Judicial Yuan,Wang Mei-ying(王梅英) ,Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙)

----------------

Double Standards in Prosecutorial Conduct? Equally troubling are recent revelations about the behavior of prosecutors.

#黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #綠色權貴 #鍾文智潛逃 #略式裁定違法 #檢察官雙標 #司法院縱放 #司法崩壞 #政治黑幕 #政治力干預司法 #新潮流特權 #官官相護 #鄭文燦 #北檢 #司法不公 #法務部雙標 #台灣司法 #台灣司法改革 #司法正義 #JudicialIntegrity #RuleOfLaw #TaiwanJustice #DoubleStandard #PoliticalCorruption #ProsecutorialDoubleStandard #PoliticalScandal #TaiwanPolitics #NoOneAboveTheLaw #JusticeCannotBeCompromised