跳到主要內容

【國昌質詢】綠色共諜橫行無阻 安全查核形同具文|2025-04-21|司法及法制委員會

2025.04.21國昌質詢|綠色共諜橫行無阻 安全查核形同具文|共諜嚴重影響國安 民進黨雙標 洩密中國不重罰 不敢辦自己人 政府國安查核機制虛設 接觸國安的職員竟「未查核」就能上任?誰能對此負責?

#國昌質詢 
去年,鄭銘謙部長下令要加強偵辦國安案件,今天法務部也於報告中列出三點嚴重的國安案件類型,但為何未納入「親中舔共」色誘、共諜入侵府院黨等樣態?難道是怕尷尬不敢提?

具體而言,國安會秘書長吳釗燮長年心腹何仁傑涉犯國安法遭羈押,國安法明文規定處罰過失犯,檢調卻遲未對吳釗燮啟動搜索與約談,辦案可以如此雙標?

更離譜的是,何仁傑明明屬於國家機密保護法第26條的列管對象,能接觸相關的國家機密,也為法務部調查局應辦理特殊查核之對象,但從2016年至2024年,何仁傑竟然僅於2016年5月辦理一次特殊查核,陳白立局長也承認,何仁傑後續兩次更動職務用人機關未依法提報查核,安全查核機制根本形同具文!

不僅如此,同樣涉入共諜案遭羈押的賴清德總統辦公室諮議吳尚雨,陳白立局長也坦承,吳尚雨從未辦理特殊查核,能夠接觸機密業務卻沒辦理查核,依法該辦查核卻未辦,如此國家安全大破口,到底誰要負責?

此外,我詢問法務部,是否贊同加重對中國洩密的處罰?可笑的是,號稱抗中保台的民進黨政府,鄭銘謙部長卻連基本立場都不敢表達,難道是因為第九屆修法時,民進黨團及時任法務部長邱太三大力反對,把加重對中國洩密的處罰封殺,法務部不敢支持?

備詢官員:法務部長 鄭銘謙 / 調查局長 陳白立

資料與影片來源:【國昌質詢】綠色共諜橫行無阻 安全查核形同具文|2025-04-21|司法及法制委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4kkG0IH3V4 @KC-Huang #黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #taiwan  #legislator #太離譜了

Translation:
Last year, Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙) ordered a more rigorous approach to investigating national security cases. Today, the Ministry of Justice(法務部) released a report identifying three major categories of serious national security threats. Yet conspicuously absent were issues such as "pro-China seduction" and "pro-Communist infiltration into government and party institutions." Are these scenarios deliberately excluded because they are politically inconvenient or too sensitive to confront?

A particularly glaring example is the case of Ho Jen-chieh(何仁傑), a formerly trusted longtime subordinate of National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu(吳釗燮), who was detained for violating the National Security Act(國安法). The Act clearly outlines penalties for negligence, yet investigators have notably delayed searching or questioning Joseph Wu. Can the integrity of a national security investigation be preserved under such blatant double standards?

Even more troubling is the fact that Ho Jen-chieh, as someone falling under Article 26 of the Classified National Secrets Acts(國家機密保護法) and possessing access to highly sensitive national secrets, should have undergone mandatory special security checks by the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau(法務部調查局). Shockingly, between 2016 and 2024, he underwent only one such check, back in May 2016. The Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau Director-General Chen Pai-li(陳白立) acknowledged that Ho's subsequent two job transfers were never reported, as required by law, for additional checks. This suggests that the security clearance mechanism has been reduced to little more than a rubber-stamp formality.

The situation becomes even more alarming when we consider Wu Shang-yu(吳尚雨), a consultant in President William Lai's office, who was also detained for alleged involvement in an espionage case. Director-General Chen Pai-li(陳白立) admitted that Wu never underwent a special security check, despite his access to classified operations. Such oversight represents a stunning lapse in national security protocol. Who, ultimately, will be held accountable for these systemic failures?

Moreover, when asked whether the Ministry of Justice supports tougher penalties for leaking secrets to China, the response was ambiguous and noncommittal. How can a government, led by the Democratic Progressive Party(DPP)—which claims to be steadfast in its opposition to China and unwavering in its defense of Taiwan—fail to take a clear stance on such a fundamental issue?

It's worth recalling that during the ninth legislative amendment, the DPP caucus and then-Minister of Justice Chiu Tai-san(邱太三) strongly opposed stricter penalties for espionage related to China, effectively sabotaging the proposal. Is this why the Ministry of Justice now hesitates to support harsher measures? Is it political fear, or an institutional unwillingness to uphold the very values the government claims to defend?

Officials to answer interpellation:Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙),Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau Director-General Chen Pai-li(陳白立)
----------------
#黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #台灣民眾黨 #國會監督 #共諜 #親中滲透民進黨府院黨 #國安破口 #國安漏洞 #查核失能 #司法雙標 #法務部 #SpyScandal #NationalSecurityFail #DoubleStandards #EspionageCrisis #InfiltrationAlert #NoMoreExcuses #StopTheLeaks

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

2025.04.22 Petition | Save Taiwan: A 911 Call for Defending Dr. Ko’s Justice & Health 4/26 – Taiwan Roars: No Dictator, No Silence

#Petition on Change org update 2025.04.22 國際請願書更新中英內容 (請協助 #國際連署)  Save Taiwan: A 911 Call for Defending Dr. Ko’s Justice & Health 4/26 – Taiwan Roars: No Dictator, No Silence Apr 22,2025                                                            H Tsao-Petition Starter On April 26, Taiwan's opposition parties—TPP and KMT—stand united, not for power, but for the people's voice. In response, Lai Ching-te's DPP did what dictators do best—suppression, smears, and mockery.

2025.04.15 台灣民眾黨 臉書

2025.04.15 #台灣民眾黨 臉書  #至少我們還有北檢? 賴清德總統上任以來,一路靠著檢調治國,司法體系似乎只剩 #姓賴保護原則,非我族類就把你弄到死!從追殺政敵柯文哲、清算異己包括鄭文燦、林岱樺、林宜瑾、陳怡君,到如今的整肅在野,誰要是敢提罷免民進黨立委的,通通抓起來! 前一天北檢出招,搜索領銜罷免民進黨立委吳思瑤、吳沛憶的藍營青年軍,並將他們移送北檢複訊。今天新北檢也動了,罷免蘇巧慧、吳琪銘的2名領銜人也遭到約談偵訊,國民黨新北市黨部也傳出遭到搜索。

【國昌質詢】海委會行政法人如何避免淪為國安破口 惡質廠商得標海巡防彈背心|2025-04-17|司法及法制委員會

2025.04.17國昌質詢|海委會行政法人如何避免淪為國安破口 惡質廠商得標海巡防彈背心 |海洋科技營運中心設置是否有安全查核問題與國防隱憂?海巡署防彈背心圍標案竟有中國進口纖維布涉嫌偽造MIT標籤 #國昌質詢 今日海洋委員會提出「國家海洋科技營運中心設置條例草案」,希望透過設置行政法人達到發展本土關鍵技術、維護國防資料安全及避免機密資訊外洩等效益,因此,未來對於該中心人員安全查核相當重要。針對我詢問之後由哪些機關負責「一般安全查核」或「特殊安全查核」,海委會副主委完全搞不清楚狀況。