【國昌質詢】殘忍虐童棄保潛逃 院檢還在胡扯踢皮球｜2025-04-23｜司法及法制委員會 Taiwan’s Child Abuse Crisis: Judicial Failures and a System in Denial

2025.04.23國昌質詢｜殘忍虐童棄保潛逃 院檢還在胡扯踢皮球｜新竹虐童案揭司法程序疏失 交保無限制出境 誰讓殘忍施暴者輕鬆出國？｜總統府提早知共諜案搜索？｜行政干預司法？內政部長越權指揮警察辦案？

#國昌質詢 

兒虐案件頻傳，去年更有高達30人遭虐死，令人痛心不已。近日新竹葉姓教練不僅用極其殘忍的手段虐童，還將施暴過程上網供人觀覽，遭檢方起訴，卻在移送法院後交保又未限制出境，搞到從容棄保潛逃，院檢不僅沒有檢討，竟還像小孩子吵架互踢皮球。

首先，我詢問得抗告之裁定需不需要製作裁判書？如此標準的法律問題，沒想到王梅英副秘書長竟東拉西扯，移審程序能否抗告有爭議，但實務上檢察官不僅可以抗告，還一再抗告，司法院為了遮掩醜事，一直胡扯！

依據刑事訴訟法，得抗告之裁定需製作裁判書並送達，但新竹地院的法官根本未製作裁定書、也未送達。更離譜的是，新竹地院還用「媒體有報導」開脫，媒體報導可以取代送達？ 

鄭銘謙部長還說，檢察官是遲至第一次開庭前才知道被告遭交保，問題是，檢察官開庭前都不用閱卷？這是法務部對檢察官的訓練？殘忍虐童遭縱放，院檢互踢皮球，沒有人要負責任？

此外，檢調偵辦共諜案，在2月18日發動第一波搜索約談，隔日將邱世元與黃取榮收押禁見後，沒想到在2月23日搜索約談吳尚雨前，總統府竟然已經事前將吳尚雨解除職務，為何總統府可以事前得知偵辦作為？調查局長說並未向總統府跟法務部報告，那到底誰洩密？我會追究到底。

最後，我詢問法務部，內政部長是司法警察官嗎？因為依據刑事訴訟法，只有檢察官可以指揮警察辦案，那憑什麼劉世芳部長公開指揮警察傳喚個案？臺灣還是法治國家嗎？

備詢官員：司法院副秘書長王梅英、法務部長鄭銘謙、調查局長陳白立

資料與影片來源：【國昌質詢】殘忍虐童棄保潛逃 院檢還在胡扯踢皮球｜2025-04-23｜司法及法制委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqtXXvjR6tE  @KC-Huang #黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #taiwan  #legislator #太離譜了

Translation:

The rising tide of child abuse cases in Taiwan is profoundly disturbing, with as many as 30 children tragically losing their lives last year alone. One of the most appalling recent incidents involved a coach, surnamed Yeh(葉姓教練), in Hsinchu. Not only did he commit acts of extreme cruelty against children, but he also brazenly uploaded videos of the abuse online. Despite being prosecuted, Yeh was inexplicably released on bail without travel restrictions after his case was transferred to the court, enabling him to abscond with ease. Even more troubling is the response from the judiciary and prosecutorial authorities, who have deflected blame rather than engaging in meaningful self-examination. Their behavior more closely resembles that of quarreling children than stewards of justice.

In seeking clarity on the legal procedures involved, I posed a straightforward question: Does a ruling subject to appeal require a written judgment? Deputy Secretary-General of the Judicial Yuan Wang Mei-ying(王梅英), however, responded evasively. Although some legal controversy surrounds whether transfer procedures can be appealed, it is well-established in practice that prosecutors do—and regularly—file such appeals. Rather than acknowledging procedural shortcomings, the Judicial Yuan(司法院) has chosen to obscure the issue through denial and excuse-making.

Under the Code of Criminal Procedure(刑事訴訟法), any ruling eligible for appeal must be accompanied by a written judgment, which must be issued and formally served. Astonishingly, the Hsinchu District Court failed to issue or serve such a ruling. In a move that defies logic, the court cited "media reports" as a substitute for official notification. Are media articles now an acceptable replacement for legally mandated procedures?

Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙) stated that the prosecutor only learned of the defendant's release shortly before the first court session. This raises a pressing question: Do prosecutors not review case files before court appearances? If not, what kind of training is the Ministry of Justice(法務部) providing its prosecutors? The release of a violent child abuser, compounded by institutional finger-pointing and procedural failure, reflects a devastating lack of accountability across the judicial system.

These concerns extend beyond this case. In a recent espionage investigation, searches and interrogations began on February 18. By the next day, Chiu Shih-yuan(邱世元) and Huang Chu-jing(黃取榮) had been detained and placed under visitation restrictions. Yet, before Wu Shang-yu's(吳尚雨) interrogation on February 23, the Presidential Office had already dismissed him from his post. How did the Presidential Office have prior knowledge of investigative actions that had yet to occur? According to the Director of the Investigation Bureau, no report was made to either the Presidential Office or the Ministry of Justice. This raises a troubling and urgent question: Who leaked this classified information? I will continue to pursue the truth until it is fully revealed.

Lastly, I sought clarification from the Ministry of Justice regarding the legal authority of the Minister of the Interior(內政部). According to the Code of Criminal Procedure, only prosecutors are authorized to direct police investigations. On what legal grounds, then, did Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang(劉世芳) publicly instruct the police to summon individuals for questioning? If government officials feel free to flout established legal boundaries, one must ask: Are we still a nation governed by the rule of law?

Officials to answer interpellation：Deputy Secretary-General of the Judicial Yuan,Wang Mei-ying(王梅英) ,Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙),Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau Director-General Chen Pai-li(陳白立)

----------------

#黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #台灣民眾黨 #國會監督 #新竹虐童案 #兒虐案件 #交保潛逃 #兒童人權 #虐童零容忍 #台灣法治危機 #司法體制改革 #檢察制度改革 #刑事訴訟法 #司法院 #法務部 #總統府洩密 #共諜洩密疑雲 #TaiwanChildAbuse #StopChildAbuse #ChildProtectionTaiwan #JusticeForTaiwanChildren #TaiwanJudicialReform #TaiwanEspionageCase #MinistryOfJusticeTaiwan

----------------

2025.04.23 #台灣民眾黨立法院黨團 臉書

詐欺犯、貪汙犯、洗錢犯、現在連人神共憤的 #虐童犯，通通可以大喇喇棄保潛逃，法院跟檢察官還互踢皮球，這麼恐怖的司法，到底能保護誰?!

新竹健身教練葉展皓，夥同堂弟對年幼的小姐弟施虐，小姊弟慘遭虐待至四肢、私密處與身體多處新舊擦挫傷發黑，送醫時奄奄一息。新竹地檢署偵查終結後移審到新竹地方法院，葉展皓和共犯堂弟分別以300萬與100萬元交保，如今虐童主嫌葉展皓竟然在3月第一次開庭前，棄保潛逃！

於是，新竹地檢署和地方法院開始扮演國家足球隊 相互推卸責任，當 黃國昌 委員質詢 #司法院 副秘書長王梅英時，被問到當時交保裁定有沒有做成公文書、有沒有送達給檢察官、有沒有載明裁定交保的理由？王梅英支支嗚嗚、問A答B，還東拉西扯說「案件偵結移審法院後是否還能抗告，在實務上、在學理上有爭論」，被黃國昌委員打臉檢察官不是整天在無限抗告嗎？有什麼爭議？王梅英副秘辯不下去後又說「是有記載在筆錄上、有當庭宣示、但流程確實要檢討。」整段護航不堪一擊，對於整個司法體系的軟爛協助縱放罪犯，讓小姊弟等不到應有的正義，卻沒有一句道歉！ 

而檢察官還忙著和法院吵架，一邊說移審後沒收到開庭通知和交保裁定書，才會錯失抗告時機；新竹法院更可恥的甩鍋到媒體，罵檢察官怎麼沒看新聞？交保當天媒體都有報！

這是什麼樣的司法？什麼樣的 #足球國家隊？法律應該是保護被害人的最後一道防線，如今卻完全破防，檢察官、法官、司法院，聯手縱放虐童犯。你們每一個成功幫助罪犯脫逃、協助撇清責任，但也都難逃人民與良心的制裁，如果你們還有良心。

來源：台灣民眾黨立法院黨團 https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19JDd2HsqQ/