2025.05.05國昌質詢｜「總統府通靈？」總統府參議吳尚雨遭閃電解職引爆洩密民進黨親信涉共諜案未查安全背景洩密給中國說會向上溯源嚴辦但遲不加重刑責？民進黨真的有在守護國安？要求北檢分案調查

#國昌質詢

民進黨政府執政下，府院黨遭共諜滲透，法務部於書面報告說，會向上溯源嚴辦是真的嗎？因為北檢偵辦綠色共諜新聞稿透露，僅以洩密罪偵辦，是怕用為中共發展組織偵辦會牽連甚廣，用鋸箭法打算只辦洩密？

前外交部長吳釗燮心腹何仁傑涉入共諜案，林佳龍部長承認未依法辦理特殊安全查核，結果外交部翻供稱何仁傑本來就不用辦，人總也說吳尚雨不用辦，立法者授權給行政機關決定誰應該辦查核，難道是民進黨大官寵臣，即便能夠接觸機敏資訊，也不用辦特殊安全查核？搞到成為共諜洩密，都不用有人負責？

此外，總統府竟然在檢調搜索約談吳尚雨前，提前將其解除職務，為何總統府提前支情？鄭銘謙部長說，不可能通報總統府，難道總統府通靈？我今天公開告發，要求北檢分案調查。

我也詢問司法院，目前設置的國安軍事專庭夠不夠專業？有沒有判刑過輕？司法院認為，國安軍事專庭法官專業程度不僅足夠，且在現行法下也無判刑過輕，至於是否提高刑度，由立法者決定。

因此我再次詢問法務部，是否贊同洩密給中國要加重處罰？可笑的是，即便先前黃世杰次長公開表態個人贊成，鄭銘謙部長還是繼續堅稱，要廣納社會各界意見，民進黨立委也未提案洩密給中國要加重處罰，民進黨政府真有守護國家安全的決心？

備詢官員：法務部長鄭銘謙 / 外交部 / 人總培訓考用處長 / 刑事廳長李釱任

資料與影片來源：【國昌質詢】鋸箭法偵辦綠色共諜？誰洩密給總統府應徹查｜2025-05-05｜司法及法制委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzc7yvkVzl4 @KC-Huang #黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #taiwan #legislator #太離譜了

Translation:

Under the Democratic Progressive Party(DPP) administration, concerns have emerged regarding the infiltration of the government by Chinese espionage networks. In a written statement, the Ministry of Justice pledged to trace the origins of such threats and enforce the law rigorously. However, according to a press release from the Taipei District Prosecutors Office concerning investigations into so-called "green spies," prosecutions have thus far been limited to charges of leaking confidential information. This raises a critical question: is the government deliberately narrowing the scope of the investigation—avoiding charges of establishing espionage networks on behalf of China—to minimize political fallout and limit exposure? Has the DPP adopted a "cutting the arrow" strategy* to contain the damage?

The case involving Ho Jen-chieh(何仁傑), a close aide to former Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu(吳釗燮), further highlights the gravity of the issue. Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung(林佳龍) acknowledged that security clearance protocols were not properly followed. Yet, in a reversal, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs later claimed that Ho Jen-chieh was not subject to such clearance requirements. The Personnel Headcounts of Central Government Agencies(行政院人事行政總處) echoed this logic in the case of Wu Shang-yu(吳尚雨), arguing that he, too, was exempt. If administrative bodies are granted full discretion to determine who undergoes security vetting, does this mean that senior DPP officials and their trusted aides—even those with access to sensitive information—can bypass standard national security procedures with impunity? When these individuals are later implicated in espionage, where does accountability lie?

Furthermore, Wu Shang-yu was dismissed from his post by the Presidential Office before any official law enforcement search or interrogation. This raises another pressing question: how did the Presidential Office acquire intelligence ahead of formal investigative action? While Minister Cheng Ming-chien stated that no advance notice was given, this discrepancy suggests the possibility of an undisclosed channel of information—one that must be scrutinized. Accordingly, I am formally filing a report and urging the Taipei District Prosecutors Office to initiate a separate investigation into this matter.

In parallel, I raised questions with the Judicial Yuan regarding the competence of the current military court and whether sentencing in such cases has been overly lenient. The Judicial Yuan responded that the court's judges possess the necessary expertise and that sentencing has remained consistent with the existing legal framework. It emphasized that decisions regarding increased penalties fall within the purview of the legislature.

Given this, I again asked the Ministry of Justice whether it supports imposing harsher penalties for leaking classified information to China.

While Fellow Deputy Minister of Justice Huang Shih-chieh(黃世杰) previously expressed personal support for tougher measures, Minister Cheng Ming-chien continues to emphasize the need for broader public consensus. Meanwhile, DPP legislators have yet to introduce legislation strengthening penalties for espionage-related offenses.

This begs a final and urgent question: does the DPP government genuinely possess the political will to defend Taiwan's national security?

Officials to answer interpellation：Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙),Head of the Judicial Yuan's Criminal Department Lee Ti-jen(李釱任)

*Cutting the arrow strategy(鋸箭法):A man pierced by an arrow sought a famed surgeon. The surgeon cut off the visible shaft and said, "My work is done."

The man cried, "But the arrowhead is still inside!"

Unmoved, the surgeon replied, "I treat what’s seen—seek a physician for what lies within." It means that challenges are frequently handled with surface-level solutions, leaving the deeper systemic issues unresolved.

----------------

#黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #台灣民眾黨 #立法院質詢 #國會監督 #揭弊 #台灣政治 #台灣新聞 #國安危機 #共諜案 #共諜滲透 #府院共諜案 #總統府解職 #洩密風波 #特權免查核 #國家機密洩漏 #情報外洩 #追究洩密 #國安軍事專庭

#調查真相 #TaiwanNews #TaiwanPolitics #TaiwanSecurity #DPPGovernment #ChineseEspionage #NationalSecurityTaiwan #EspionageInvestigation #SpyScandalTaiwan #TaiwanLegislature #SecurityClearance #ProtectTaiwan

天佑好人

搜尋此網誌