跳到主要內容

2025.05.21國昌質詢|共諜案吳釗燮拒絕赴立法院備詢 共諜潛伏國安漏洞安全查核改革卻無法承諾?假博士學歷江雅綺任英國公使 降低台灣國際形象 又被檢舉在科技部學歷申報造假 政府人事機制如此荒謬?

2025.05.21國昌質詢|共諜案吳釗燮拒絕赴立法院備詢 共諜潛伏國安漏洞安全查核改革卻無法承諾?假博士學歷江雅綺任英國公使 降低台灣國際形象 又被檢舉在科技部學歷申報造假 政府人事機制如此荒謬?
  
#國昌質詢
今天立法院審查總統府及國安會解凍案,結果從早上等到下午,國安會秘書長吳釗燮始終不肯至立法院,民進黨立委護航稱,過去三任總統任內處理解凍案時,皆是由副秘書長至立法院,但當時有哪一位國安會秘書長是把共諜帶在身邊嗎?作為立法委員,如此幫行政部門洗地,實在可恥。

綠色共諜橫行,府院黨均淪陷!我詢問總統府,涉入共諜案、賴清德任副總統時辦公室諮議吳尚雨,是否辦理特殊查核?總統府說,吳尚雨的身分僅須一般查核,但這樣的強度足夠嗎?

何志偉副秘書長坦承,查核強度並不夠,但當我詢問制度改革的期程,何副祕東拉西扯就是無法承諾具體時間,並稱還在跑行政流程,這不是國家安全的重大漏洞嗎?高喊抗中保臺的民進黨政府如此輕忽?

我也持續追蹤,為何總統府在檢調搜索約談吳尚雨之前就知情?到底誰洩密?何志偉副秘書長說,吳尚羽是2月19日自行辭職,就這麼巧,同案被告遭收押後,吳尚雨就自行請辭?而且,潛伏2年5個月,總統府都沒有發現任何異樣?

近日,賴清德總統任命江雅綺教授為英國公使,但江雅綺早已被科技部認證填寫不實學歷,派一個學歷造假者出任英國公使,根本把臉丟到國外去!臺灣是沒有人才了?

更扯的是,當初江雅綺向科技部申請計畫時,身為大學教授、計畫主持人,竟然不同意公開主要學歷,這到底是在遮掩什麼?明明從社會科學與健康學院畢業,卻長期對外宣稱自身為法學博士,這不是造假,什麼才是造假?如果學歷造假者可以出任英國公使,難道以後學歷愛怎麼填都可以?

備詢官員:總統府副秘書長何志偉

資料與影片來源:【國昌質詢】遭共諜滲透的總統府 學歷造假的英國公使|2025-05-21|司法及法制委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAmbSyCnt8Y  #黃國昌  #HuangKuoChang #taiwan  #legislator #太離譜了

Translation:
Today, the Legislative Yuan reviewed the unfreezing cases involving the Presidential Office and the National Security Council. From morning to afternoon, National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu(吳釗燮) repeatedly refused to appear before the legislature. DPP lawmakers defended him, arguing that in previous administrations, such matters were routinely handled by the Deputy Secretary-General. But let's be honest—has a National Security Council Secretary-General ever served alongside someone implicated in a Chinese espionage case? Defending the executive branch under these circumstances is not only irresponsible—it is disgraceful.

Chinese espionage is no longer a distant threat; it is embedded within our government, infiltrating the executive branch and even the ruling party. I posed pointed questions to the Presidential Office about Wu Shang-yu(吳尚雨), a former consultant to then-Vice President William Lai implicated in an espionage investigation. I asked whether a special security vetting process had been conducted. Their response? Wu underwent only a routine security check. Is that truly adequate for someone in such a sensitive position?

Presidential Office Deputy Secretary-General Mark Ho(何志偉) admitted the vetting process was insufficient. Yet, when pressed on when reforms would be implemented, he evaded the question, offering no timeline and vague references to "ongoing administrative processes." This is a glaring national security vulnerability. How can a government that claims to "resist China and protect Taiwan" be so negligent in safeguarding its highest offices?

I am also closely monitoring the sequence of events. How did the Presidential Office know about the investigation into Wu Shang-yu before law enforcement acted? Who leaked that information? According to Ho, Wu "voluntarily" resigned on February 19. The timing is suspiciously convenient—his resignation coincided with the arrest of another suspect in the same case. Wu had infiltrated the Presidential Office for over two years. Are we to believe no one noticed suspicious activity during that time?

Equally troubling is the appointment of Professor Chiang Ya-chi(江雅綺) as Taiwan's deputy head of the Taipei Representative Office in the UK. This individual was previously found by the National Science and Technology Council(科技部) to have falsified her academic credentials. Appointing someone with a fake degree to represent Taiwan on the global stage is not only inappropriate—it is a national embarrassment. Does Taiwan truly lack qualified, credible talent?

Even more alarming, when Chiang applied for government research funding, she refused to disclose her primary academic credentials. As a university professor and project lead, what was she hiding? She graduated from the Faculty of Social Sciences and Health, yet long claimed to hold a PhD in Law—an outright fabrication. If this isn't academic fraud, what is? Allowing such falsification sends a dangerous message: anyone can fabricate credentials and be rewarded with top diplomatic posts.

Official to answer interpellation:Presidential Office Deputy Secretary-General Mark Ho(何志偉)
----------------
#黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #台灣民眾黨 #立法院質詢 #國會監督 #揭弊 #國家安全 #共諜案 #政府失能 #洩密案 #江雅綺 #學歷造假 #學術誠信 #TaiwanPolitics #NationalSecurity #Espionage #AcademicFraud #DiplomaticScandal

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

2025.04.22 Petition | Save Taiwan: A 911 Call for Defending Dr. Ko’s Justice & Health 4/26 – Taiwan Roars: No Dictator, No Silence

#Petition on Change org update 2025.04.22 國際請願書更新中英內容 (請協助 #國際連署)  Save Taiwan: A 911 Call for Defending Dr. Ko’s Justice & Health 4/26 – Taiwan Roars: No Dictator, No Silence Apr 22,2025                                                            H Tsao-Petition Starter On April 26, Taiwan's opposition parties—TPP and KMT—stand united, not for power, but for the people's voice. In response, Lai Ching-te's DPP did what dictators do best—suppression, smears, and mockery.

2025.04.15 台灣民眾黨 臉書

2025.04.15 #台灣民眾黨 臉書  #至少我們還有北檢? 賴清德總統上任以來,一路靠著檢調治國,司法體系似乎只剩 #姓賴保護原則,非我族類就把你弄到死!從追殺政敵柯文哲、清算異己包括鄭文燦、林岱樺、林宜瑾、陳怡君,到如今的整肅在野,誰要是敢提罷免民進黨立委的,通通抓起來! 前一天北檢出招,搜索領銜罷免民進黨立委吳思瑤、吳沛憶的藍營青年軍,並將他們移送北檢複訊。今天新北檢也動了,罷免蘇巧慧、吳琪銘的2名領銜人也遭到約談偵訊,國民黨新北市黨部也傳出遭到搜索。

【國昌質詢】海委會行政法人如何避免淪為國安破口 惡質廠商得標海巡防彈背心|2025-04-17|司法及法制委員會

2025.04.17國昌質詢|海委會行政法人如何避免淪為國安破口 惡質廠商得標海巡防彈背心 |海洋科技營運中心設置是否有安全查核問題與國防隱憂?海巡署防彈背心圍標案竟有中國進口纖維布涉嫌偽造MIT標籤 #國昌質詢 今日海洋委員會提出「國家海洋科技營運中心設置條例草案」,希望透過設置行政法人達到發展本土關鍵技術、維護國防資料安全及避免機密資訊外洩等效益,因此,未來對於該中心人員安全查核相當重要。針對我詢問之後由哪些機關負責「一般安全查核」或「特殊安全查核」,海委會副主委完全搞不清楚狀況。