2025.05.26國昌質詢｜從屏東郭再添到徐少東 防逃機制失靈 到底基於什麼理由不用電子監控？因人設事？司法院想解除強制處分凍結的預算但無實際作為？ 司法漏洞官員竟以「不知道」這荒謬說法來應付了事？

2025.05.26國昌質詢｜從屏東郭再添到徐少東 防逃機制失靈 到底基於什麼理由不用電子監控？因人設事？司法院想解除強制處分凍結的預算但無實際作為？ 司法漏洞官員竟以「不知道」這荒謬說法來應付了事？

  

#國昌質詢

針對權貴不斷落跑，在審查今年度司法院預算時我提出凍結案，要求司法院回頭審視強制處分審核成效不彰的情事，豈料，今天司法院提出的解凍報告，竟以2023年所做過的事來搪塞，高等法院的解凍報告更是只有一頁，這樣的解涷報告是否周延，連司法院副秘書長都只能愣在質詢台上無法回答。

具體而言，先前落跑的兩位金融重犯鍾文智和徐少東都曾有逃亡紀錄，卻連電子監控都不必，不禁令人懷疑難道有權有勢的人怎麼亂搞都沒關係嗎？

前兩天，又一個判刑定讞的罪犯落跑，正是無黨籍屏東縣議員郭再添。這位議員，同樣是過去曾經逃亡，卻也一樣連電子監控都不用，也難怪媒體諷刺道地方人士表示所有的人都知道郭再添要跑，只有司法單位不知道。

正是因為當強制處分的結果與人民的認知落差如此之大，所以我才會提案凍結，然而，凍結報告卻虛應故事，完全沒有回答人民的疑惑。

此外，根據媒體報導，最高法院是在全案定讞5天後才通知屏東地檢署，為何沒有通知在第一時間啟動防逃機制，司法院完全沒有辦法說明，只能說在此案中郭再添議員的身分並不明顯這種令人難以接受的回答。如何把漏洞填補起來，而不是開一大堆會，最後只有一句不知道，才能有辦法挽回人民對司法瀕臨破產的信任。

備詢官員：司法院秘書長 王梅英 / 刑事廳長 李釱任

資料與影片來源：【國昌質詢】棄保潛逃再加一　虛應故事的解凍報告｜2025-05-26｜司法及法制委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHQyVYFp6gY #黃國昌  #HuangKuoChang #taiwan  #legislator #太離譜了

Translation:

In response to the continued impunity of the powerful and privileged, I proposed a budget freeze during the review of this year's Judicial Yuan(司法院) budget, urging a reassessment of the judiciary's ineffective oversight of compulsory measures. However, the Judicial Yuan's recent report seeking to lift the budget freeze is deeply disappointing. Rather than addressing current failures, the report relies solely on actions taken in 2023 to deflect scrutiny. Astonishingly, the High Court's contribution amounted to just a single page.Regardless of whether the content of these reports is deemed adequate, the Deputy Secretary-General of the Judicial Yuan was left speechless during questioning—unable to offer even a basic response.

Particularly troubling are the cases of financial criminals Chung Wen-chih(鍾文智) and Hsu Shao-tung(徐少東). Both had prior records of fleeing, yet were inexplicably not placed under electronic monitoring. This raises serious concerns: do those with wealth and influence enjoy a de facto exemption from the rule of law?

This issue was further underscored just two days ago when Pingtung County Councilor Kuo Tsai-tien(郭再添)—an independent politician—fled the country after a conviction. Kuo, too, had a prior escape record, yet, once again, no electronic monitoring was imposed. Media reports sarcastically noted that "everyone knew Kuo Tsai-tien would flee—except the judicial authorities." This observation is a damning indictment of the system's glaring negligence.

The disconnect between the judiciary's handling of compulsory measures and public expectations is enormous. That is precisely why I called for the budget freeze in the first place. Yet, the report submitted to justify unfreezing these funds is superficial at best and does nothing to meaningfully address the public's legitimate concerns.

Adding to the outrage, media sources report that the Supreme Court notified the Pingtung District Prosecutors Office five days after Kuo's case was finalized. Why was there such a delay in activating escape prevention protocols? The Judicial Yuan offered no clear answer, instead claiming that Councilor Kuo's "status was not prominent" —a wholly unacceptable explanation.

The core issue is not the perceived prominence of individuals but rather the systematic failure to address procedural loopholes that enable repeat offenders to flee justice. These cannot be resolved by holding endless internal meetings that conclude with "we don't know." Restoring public trust in the judiciary—now hanging by a thread—demands accountability, transparency, and, above all, real reform.

Official to answer interpellation：Deputy Secretary-General of the Judicial Yuan Wang Mei-ying(王梅英), Head of the Judicial Yuan's Criminal Department Lee Ti-jen(李釱任)

----------------

#黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #台灣民眾黨 #立法院質詢 #國會監督 #揭弊 #郭再添 #防逃機制 #法律不該雙標 #電子監控缺失 #司法改革 #司法院預算 #TaiwanNews #TaiwanJustice #JudicialReform