2025.06.18國昌質詢｜民進黨再次雙標 2012年播實際偵訊光碟大力贊同 今如今卻稱示範帶是偽造文書？王義川涉違個資法 詐騙金流未細查 偷拍未成年只輕罰 洩漏吹哨者僅記申誡 台灣司法亂象重重 卻選擇性執法？

2025.06.18國昌質詢｜民進黨再次雙標 2012年播實際偵訊光碟大力贊同 如今卻稱示範帶是偽造文書？王義川涉違個資法 詐騙金流未細查 偷拍未成年只輕罰 洩漏吹哨者僅記申誡 台灣司法亂象重重 卻選擇性執法？

#國昌質詢

針對我播放惡檢不正訊問的錄音示範，有民進黨立委告發我違法，不僅毫無法治素養，更是雙標至極！當初民進黨為了自家政治人物的貪汙案，直接播送偵訊光碟，民進黨不但全面拍手叫好，更沒有說這是違法，拿到權力轉變之大，讓人嘆為觀止。

至於民進黨立委可笑的濫行告訴，法務部及北檢要隨之起舞，充當政治打手，我也沒有在怕。為了對抗惡勢力，從陳明文、洪耀福、蘇治芬，到最近的許智傑，我已經被民進黨濫訴告了多次。至今為止，民進黨告我的勝訴率是零。如果民進黨搞不清楚公開偵訊光碟的法律常識，可以去看羅秉成前政委當年「公開偵訊光碟 有何不可？」的專文。

先前，王義川宣稱用基地台訊號比對個人身分，涉嫌違反《個人資料保護法》及《通訊保障及監察法》，已經遭到告發，請問北檢偵辦到哪？

每月詐騙受理案件數、財產損失金額大幅上升，政府的打詐作為如何？今年5月，法務部長及北檢檢察長跑到扣案精品拍賣會作秀，我詢問鄭銘謙部長，該詐騙案的受損金額多少？

毫不意外，部長一問三不知。原來，有11人遭詐騙近50億元，法務部好大喜功放新聞稱，已經追回10億，結果細查起訴書才發現只追回2100萬，鄭銘謙部長還硬拗「怎麼會沒有10億」，難道部長只要跑去拍照就好？都不用關心詐騙案的結果與受害人？

我也出示照片公開檢舉，主嫌羅佩雯與黑道份子往來密切，結果檢調辦案用鋸箭法，黑道金流通通沒查，我要求檢調依法偵辦，不要包庇放水。

調查官以祕錄設備偷拍未成年女性裙底，結果如此令人髮指的行為，後續只記了一大過仍在原職，對於調查官的標準如此低落，到底是什麼性平觀念？

民眾向廉政署檢舉警政署保二總隊成員浮報加班費，檢舉人身分竟被洩漏給保二總隊，結果對於洩漏吹哨者身分者，警政署也是不痛不癢的記一支申誡，這真的有在保護吹哨者？

備詢官員：法務部長鄭銘謙、警政署長張榮興

資料與影片來源：【國昌質詢】雙標法盲的民進黨 作秀擺拍的打詐｜2025-06-18｜司法及法制委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YB6dKGKcyhc #黃國昌  #HuangKuoChang #taiwan  #legislator #太離譜了

Translation:

In response to my public disclosure of an audio recording exposing an illegal and improper interrogation, some Democratic Progressive Party(DPP) legislators accused me of breaking the law. This accusation not only reveals a profound misunderstanding of legal principles but also smacks of hypocrisy. When the DPP previously faced a corruption scandal involving one of their own, they publicly released interrogation footage and were widely praised for it. No one questioned the legality of their actions then. Their dramatic reversal now that they hold power is nothing short of astounding.

Regarding the baseless lawsuit filed by this DPP legislator: if the Ministry of Justice and the Taipei District Prosecutors Office choose to act as political enforcers, I remain undeterred. Over the years, I have faced numerous frivolous lawsuits from DPP figures—Chen Ming-wen(陳明文) , Hung Yao-fu(洪耀福), Su Chih-feng(蘇治芬), and most recently, Hsu Chih-chieh(許智傑)—all of which have failed. If they still fail to grasp the legal precedent for publicizing interrogation footage, I suggest they revisit former Minister without Portfolio Lo Ping-cheng's(羅秉成) article, "What's Wrong with Publicizing Interrogation Footage?"

Separately, Wang Yi-chuan(王義川) once publicly claimed he could identify individuals using cell tower signals—a practice that likely violates both the Personal Data Protection Act(個人資料保護法) and the Communication Security and Surveillance Act(通訊保障及監察法). I ask: what progress has the Taipei District Prosecutors Office made in investigating this matter?

Meanwhile, fraud reports and financial losses continue to surge month after month. What concrete measures has the government implemented to address this alarming trend? In May, the Minister of Justice and the Taipei Chief Prosecutor attended an auction of luxury goods seized from criminals—a transparent publicity stunt. When I questioned Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙) about the actual losses in these fraud cases, he predictably had no answer. In one case, 11 victims were defrauded of nearly NT$5 billion. The Ministry of Justice issued a press release claiming they recovered NT$1 billion, but the indictment reveals only NT$21 million was actually recovered. Yet Minister Cheng insists, "How could there not be NT$1 billion recovered?" Is he more concerned with photo opportunities than delivering justice for victims?

Furthermore, I have offered photographic evidence exposing suspect Lo Pei-wen's(羅佩雯) close ties to organized crime. Yet investigators seem to be selectively ignoring the gang's financial transactions. I demand a thorough, transparent investigation with no cover-ups.

Consider also the shocking case of a government investigator who sed hidden recording devices to secretly film under the skirt of an underage girl. Despite the gravity of this offense, the only disciplinary action was a demerit, and the individual remains in their position. What does this say about our standards for gender equality and accountability?

Finally, a whistleblower courageously exposed fraudulent overtime claims by members of the National Police Agency's Second Special Police Corps, which operates under the Agency Against Corruption, engaged in fraudulent overtime claims. Their identity was leaked back to the agency they reported, yet the leaker received only a mild reprimand. Is this the standard by which we protect whistleblowers in this country?

Officials to answer interpellation：Minister of Justice Cheng Ming-chien(鄭銘謙), National Police Agency Director-General Chang Jung-hsin(張榮興)

----------------

#黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #台灣民眾黨 #立法院質詢 #國會監督 #揭弊 #公開偵訊光碟 #民進黨雙標 #打詐無力  #黑道金流 #詐騙案件 #偷拍未成年 #檢舉浮報加班 #吹哨者保護 #司法亂象 #官員卸責 #王義川 #個資法 #通訊監察法 #TaiwanPolitics #PoliticalHypocrisy #JudicialReform #WhistleblowerProtection #TaiwanNews