2025.04.30國昌質詢｜幣想科技洗錢與詐騙集團勾結案曝光金管會洗錢聲明淪背書工具讓幣想掛合法之名洗錢助長虛擬貨幣公司犯罪金流破億重創金管會公信力引發監管疑慮 CryptoScam

2025.04.30國昌質詢｜#幣想科技洗錢與詐騙集團勾結案曝光金管會洗錢聲明淪背書工具讓幣想掛合法之名洗錢助長虛擬貨幣公司犯罪金流破億重創金管會公信力引發監管疑慮 #CryptoScam

#國昌質詢

詐騙洗錢已經成為所有台灣人的痛，近年虛擬貨幣成為洗錢工具早就不是新聞，因此去年我們積極處理打詐四法（編按：民國113年7月三讀通過「打詐新4法」，包括「詐欺犯罪危害防制條例」、「通訊保障及監察法」、「刑事訴訟法特殊強制處分專章」(科技偵查法制化)及「洗錢防制法」）、也不斷要求行政機關對於虛擬貨幣要採高度管制，就是要避免越來越多民眾淪為受害者。

近日爆發「幣想科技」跟詐騙集團勾結洗錢，金流每月高達上億元。大家也質疑，現在虛擬貨幣管制究竟做到什麼程度？

經追查，我赫然發現幣想科技網站寫著「全台唯一授權、已通過金管會洗錢防制聲明」，這難道不是笑話嗎？通過了然後呢？這個聲明到底有什麼意義？不就是自我表彰創造自己是合法的假象欺騙大眾，現實上無法發揮任何效果？

金管會辯稱，第一步先由業者申請洗錢防制聲明開始，112年也檢查了4家大規模幣商，還進行了裁罰，也不是沒有作為，現在有更嚴格的登記制的申請，會再嚴格審查。然而，112年檢查的四家不僅沒有包含「幣想科技」，且裁罰金額僅有150萬，簡直不痛不癢。

我最後提醒金管會兩件事，幣想負責人施啟能是前任亞太易安BitAsset總經理，BitAsset是由陸資新湃區塊鏈非法在台設立，創立虛擬貨幣交易平台，在2024年就曾遭檢調搜索，這件事早就是公開資訊，金管會有沒有掌握？

再來「幣想科技」部分網站暫停營運，部分網站竟顯示可持續交易，金管會有沒有掌握、有沒有處理？還是繼續縱容詐騙業者？我請金管會務必注意，不要再背書成為詐團幫凶、讓洗錢防制聲明淪為大笑話。

備詢官員：金管會主委彭金隆

資料與影片來源：【國昌質詢】金管會背書詐團幫凶，洗錢防制聲明淪大笑話｜2025-04-30｜財政委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw074Zotbts @KC-Huang #黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #taiwan #legislator #太離譜了

Translation:

Fraud and money laundering have become a painful reality for the people of Taiwan. In recent years, virtual currencies have increasingly become vehicles for illicit financial activity—a fact that is no longer surprising. This is precisely why, last year, we strongly advocated for the passage of amendments to the Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act(詐欺犯罪危害防制條例), Code of Criminal Procedure(刑事訴訟法), Communication Security, Surveillance Act(通訊保障及監察法), and Money Laundering Control Act(洗錢防制法) and also consistently urged government agencies to implement robust regulations on virtual currency platforms to safeguard the public from such schemes.

The recent Bitshine(幣想科技) scandal has further heightened public alarm. Evidence suggests the company colluded with organized fraud rings to facilitate large-scale money laundering, with monthly financial flows exceeding one billion NTD. This case raises serious questions about the effectiveness and integrity of Taiwan's regulatory framework for virtual assets.

Upon closer inspection, I was astounded to find that Bitshine's website claimed to be "the only authorized entity in Taiwan approved by the Financial Supervisory Commission(FSC) for Anti-Money Laundering compliance." Such a statement is not only misleading but borders on absurd. What does such an "approval" actually entail? What happens after it is granted? Is this merely a self-proclaimed badge of legitimacy used to deceive the public while offering no real oversight or protection?

The FSC maintains that the first step toward regulation is for businesses to apply for an Anti-Money Laundering(AML) compliance statement. In 2023, the FSC inspected four major cryptocurrency exchanges and imposed fines as part of its enforcement efforts.

It also announced a tighter registration system and plans for stricter vetting. However, Bitshin was not among the four inspected exchanges, and the total fine imposed across all entities was a mere 1.5 million NTD—an amount so minimal it hardly serves as a deterrent.

I raise two urgent concerns with the FSC:

First, the head of Bitshin, Shih Chi-neng(施啟能), previously served as the General Manager of BitAsset(亞太易安特)—a platform illegally established in Taiwan by the China-backed XinPai(新湃) Blockchain to operate a virtual currency exchange. This entity was already subject to a law enforcement raid in 2024. This information has been publicly available for some time. Was the FSC unaware of this connection?

Second, although parts of the Bitshin website have reportedly suspended operations, some sections remain active and appear to facilitate ongoing transactions. Has the FSC taken notice? Have any enforcement actions been initiated? Or is inaction enabling fraudulent operators to continue exploiting the public?

The FSC must act without delay. It must ensure that the AML compliance statement does not become a hollow label that offers cover for bad actors. Regulatory agencies must not become unwitting enablers of crime. Accountability, transparency, and swift enforcement are the bare minimum the public deserves in the fight against financial fraud.

Officials to answer interpellation：Chairman of the Financial Supervisory Commission(FSC) Peng Jin-lung(彭金隆)

----------------

#黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #台灣民眾黨 #立法院質詢 #國會監督 #幣想科技 #詐騙集團 #虛擬貨幣洗錢 #金管會 #洗錢防制聲明 #虛擬貨幣詐騙 #區塊鏈詐騙 #虛擬貨幣監管 #TaiwanCrypto #TaiwanFinance #CryptoScam #FinancialSecurity #VirtualCurrency #AntiMoneyLaundering #BlockchainRegulation #CryptocurrencyRegulation #CryptoWithIntegrity

天佑好人

搜尋此網誌