跳到主要內容

2025.06.11國昌質詢|史哲無交通背景引工會怒聲 官員用「任命仍在程序中」避答高鐵用人問題 無相關專業酬庸把人民的利益放在哪裡?楊梅休息站失職設計釀多起死傷事故 未圖施工防撞設施高公局誰要負責?

2025.06.11國昌質詢|史哲無交通背景引工會怒聲 官員用「任命仍在程序中」避答高鐵用人問題 無相關專業酬庸把人民的利益放在哪裡?楊梅休息站失職設計釀多起死傷事故 未圖施工防撞設施高公局誰要負責?

#國昌質詢
毫無交通資歷的前文化部長史哲空降為高鐵董事長,引發社會譁然,高鐵工會更痛批是對專業經理人的侮辱!不僅如此,史哲還曾被揭露為霸凌下屬、濫用公務車接送推拿行程,只要有黨證,怎麼亂搞都還是能坐領高薪?

今天我請教交通部,史哲到底有何交通專業?陳彥伯次長無法正面回答,僅持續跳針「程序仍在進行中」,明明中央社已報導,行政院證實已經核定史哲出任高鐵董事長,還是國家通訊社放假訊息?

另外,桃園楊梅休息站設計不良,3年就發生13起車禍,造成7人死亡、23人受傷,然而,當今年1月發生4死車禍時,高公局才剛稱,入口路線設計及交通設施符合規範,今年3月隨即再度發生擦撞分隔島車禍,到底還要用多少人命,高公局才願意改革?

今天高公局說,去年11月有做改善,結果今年繼續發生死傷車禍,這些改善有用嗎?具體而言,依據高公局規定,水泥分隔島前應施作碰撞防護設施,結果高公局於前面加幾個交通桶,這真的有用嗎?何況,當初設計圖說明確劃應建置漸進式碰撞防護設施,為何未按照圖說施工?

備詢官員:交通部次長 陳彥伯

資料與影片來源:【國昌質詢】國營事業淪派系酬庸 設計不良的楊梅休息站|2025-06-11|交通委員會 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97pdoUWqyLI #黃國昌  #HuangKuoChang #taiwan  #legislator #太離譜了

Outrage over Shih Che’s appointment as THSRC Chairman—lacking transport expertise & tied to past scandals. MOTC dodges questions, while CNA confirms the pick. Meanwhile, Yangmei Service Area’s deadly crashes continue despite "improvements." Where’s the accountability?  #Taiwan

Translation:
The recent appointment of former Minister of Culture Shih Che(史哲) as Chairman of the Taiwan High-Speed Rail Corporation(THSRC) has sparked widespread public outrage. Critics highlight Shih's lack of experience in transportation, questioning the rationale for appointing him to lead one of the country's most technically complex and strategically vital infrastructure systems. The THSRC Labor Union issued a strong statement condemning the decision, calling it "an insult to professional managers" and a serious affront to the integrity of Taiwan's transportation sector.Concerns about Shih's suitability are compounded by past allegations, including accusations of workplace bullying and misuse of government vehicles for personal errands, such as massage appointments. This raises a critical question: does mere DPP party affiliation guarantee a high-ranking, high-paying post, regardless of qualifications or past conduct?

Today, I directly raised these concerns with the Ministry of Transportation(交通部), specifically asking Deputy Minister Chen Yen-po(陳彥伯) about Shih Che's qualifications in transportation. Rather than providing a substantive response, Deputy Minister Chen repeatedly deflected, stating only that "the process is still ongoing." This evasiveness contrasts sharply with a Central News Agency(CNA) report, which confirmed Shih's appointment based on information from the Executive Yuan. If the appointment is finalized, was the Central News Agency(中央通訊社) reporting inaccurately, or is the Ministry simply avoiding accountability?

In addition to this troubling appointment, public safety on Taiwan's freeways demands urgent attention—particularly the tragic case of the Yangmei Service Area in Taoyuan(桃園楊梅休息站). Over the past three years, this poorly designed section of roadway has seen 13 traffic accidents, resulting in seven deaths and 23 injuries. In January of this year, four lives were lost in a single crash, just days after the Freeway Bureau(交通部高速公路局) publicly claimed that the area's entrance design and traffic control facilities "met all required standards." Despite these assurances, another serious collision occurred in March, when a vehicle struck the median strip.How many more lives must be lost before Taiwan's transportation authorities implement genuine, evidence-based reforms?

The Freeway Bureau claims that "improvements" were implemented in November of the previous year. If these measures were effective, why do fatal accidents persist? Have these improvements undergone independent evaluation? More pressingly, what constitutes an "improvement" in the Bureau's view?
According to the Bureau's own safety guidelines, proper collision protection installations must be placed in front of fixed concrete medium strip. Yet, at Yangmei, only a handful of traffic cones were deployed—hardly sufficient to prevent or mitigate the impact of a high-speed crash. Moreover, the original engineering plans for the site clearly called for gradual-impact protecting facilities. Why were these not constructed as planned? Who made the decision to deviate from safety protocols, and what accountability measures are in place?

Officials to answer interpellation:Deputy Minister of Transportation and Communications Chen Yen-po(陳彥伯)
----------------
#黃國昌 #HuangKuoChang #台灣民眾黨 #立法院質詢 #國會監督 #揭弊 #高鐵人事爭議 #史哲 #政治酬庸 #交通部失職 #交通設施不良 #防撞設施缺失 #交通安全改革 #TaiwanHighSpeedRail #PoliticalAppointments #YangmeiServiceArea #TaiwanTrafficSafety #TaiwanPolitics

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

2026年的新年感謝

年末將至,2025年即將成為過去,我在「天佑好人」頻道,此刻想藉著這段文字,向每位默默支持、熱情關注頻道的朋友們,獻上最深切、最溫暖的感謝。

2025.06.23國昌質詢|曾彈劾他人濫用公務車的監委 如今自己違法卻不下台?拖延的紀律委員會可能無法處理李俊俋 惹疑官官相護?官員想幫監委開脫? 監察法規定別想轉彎 禁伐補償預算未兌現考驗政府誠信

2025.06.23國昌質詢|曾彈劾他人濫用公務車的監委 如今自己違法卻不下台?拖延的紀律委員會可能無法處理李俊俋 惹疑官官相護?官員想幫監委開脫? 監察法規定別想轉彎 禁伐補償預算未兌現考驗政府誠信 #國昌質詢 去年6月,立法院修法通過原住民禁伐補償每公頃調升至6萬元,行政院卻未於總預算中編列相關預算,直到11月朝野黨團協商時,卓榮泰院長才承諾會提追加預算,請問何時要提出?

2025.06.18國昌質詢|民進黨再次雙標 2012年播實際偵訊光碟大力贊同 今如今卻稱示範帶是偽造文書?王義川涉違個資法 詐騙金流未細查 偷拍未成年只輕罰 洩漏吹哨者僅記申誡 台灣司法亂象重重 卻選擇性執法?

2025.06.18國昌質詢|民進黨再次雙標 2012年播實際偵訊光碟大力贊同 如今卻稱示範帶是偽造文書?王義川涉違個資法 詐騙金流未細查 偷拍未成年只輕罰 洩漏吹哨者僅記申誡 台灣司法亂象重重 卻選擇性執法? #國昌質詢 針對我播放惡檢不正訊問的錄音示範,有民進黨立委告發我違法,不僅毫無法治素養,更是雙標至極!當初民進黨為了自家政治人物的貪汙案,直接播送偵訊光碟,民進黨不但全面拍手叫好,更沒有說這是違法,拿到權力轉變之大,讓人嘆為觀止。